Any person has his own personal life path. A person believes that it is truly unique. However we may find a number of identical things that actually makes us all similar.
There is actually a structure of certain characteristics that describe us. In studying people researchers find that they hold the same structures with only difference – there is a unique image of inside particles.

Going deeper into it we may look at a self-definition pattern that is structured with self-similar parts such as Thinking, Needs, Love, Age, Emotions and Age. Inside each of them we have almost same structure. For example in Thinking we have five basic steps of thinking process. First time this has been described on human DNA by David Hilbers, who claims that all information for the human cells has fractal structure as it is shown on the picture.
So why not to define any person’s life information in a same way as fractals are structured. Inside each part there is a smaller identical part and this might be replicated for all type of information.

Thinking Processes

TO – indicates the purpose or objective of the thinking.
LO – indicates the information available and the information needed.
PO – is the stage of possibility. How do we create possibilities?
SO – narrows down, checks out and chooses from amongst the possibilities. This is the stage of conclusion, decision and choice. This is the result stage.
GO – indicates the ‘action step.’

So if we agree to this categorization, we could create patterns of people acting and experiencing things in a very similar way however remain unique in general.
Now imagine that people can finally find similar people and connect with them directly. This data may boost the research of needs and emotions and form a true social pattern that is impossible to research with mere questionnaires and focus groups. This may be ideal correlation chain where self-similarity is the only connecting particle that make people get interested in each other.

Connection = Self-similarity

Self-similarity based interaction may be a new communication mechanism by which people are getting focused on things that interest them most and are able to share more and more information on that. It is especially crucial in our age of total information overload. This might be the next step in semantic based communication tools.

-Albert